In detail, what the coach of Olympiacos, José Anigo, said at the press conference of the away match against AEK:
What flavour does the match leave you with? Also, how instrumental was the first half you had with AEK in Karaiskakis, during your preparation for the match? Because we saw a different philosophy.
We analysed the video of this match a lot and saw our mistakes. Thus, we chose a different system, so that our defence is more compact and to fill the gaps with the 4-1-4-1 approach. I think that this way we really created problems for AEK. Apart from the fact that AEK had possession of the ball, we believe that we had the best opportunities to score. But I would like to express some questions I have to a referee who is my compatriot, a Frenchman. I don’t understand why the added time was nine minutes, why we play with rules that we don’t understand, why we need to score repeatedly in order for a goal to count? How many times does Olympiacos have to score for a goal to be valid? In general this year, Olympiacos has been having issues with the arbitration and there are some things that I still do not understand.
